mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-09-22 04:34:03 +02:00
mm: handle VM_UFFD_RWP in khugepaged, rmap, and GUP
Three mm paths outside the fault handler gate on the uffd PTE bit today: khugepaged (skip collapse on ranges carrying markers), rmap (cap unmap batching), and GUP (force a fault through gup_can_follow_protnone). Extend each to treat VM_UFFD_RWP the same as VM_UFFD_WP; otherwise per-PTE RWP state is silently destroyed or bypassed. khugepaged: try_collapse_pte_mapped_thp() and file_backed_vma_is_retractable() already refuse to collapse or retract page tables on ranges carrying the uffd PTE bit. Broaden the VMA predicate from userfaultfd_wp() to userfaultfd_protected() so VM_UFFD_RWP ranges get the same protection. hpage_collapse_scan_pmd() needs no change — its existing pte_uffd() check already catches an RWP PTE because it carries the uffd bit. rmap: folio_unmap_pte_batch() caps batching at 1 for VM_UFFD_RWP so the restore path handles each PTE with its own marker. GUP: gup_can_follow_protnone() forces a fault on VM_UFFD_RWP VMAs regardless of FOLL_HONOR_NUMA_FAULT. RWP uses protnone as an access-tracking marker, not for NUMA hinting, so any GUP — read or write — must go through the userfaultfd fault path. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260708111417.173443-9-kirill@shutemov.name Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6 Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Liam Howlett <liam@infradead.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
763f43865f
commit
7974c23853
|
|
@ -4654,11 +4654,25 @@ static inline int vm_fault_to_errno(vm_fault_t vm_fault, int foll_flags)
|
|||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Indicates whether GUP can follow a PROT_NONE mapped page, or whether
|
||||
* a (NUMA hinting) fault is required.
|
||||
* a (NUMA hinting or userfaultfd RWP) fault is required.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool gup_can_follow_protnone(const struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
unsigned int flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* VM_UFFD_RWP uses protnone as an access-tracking marker, not for
|
||||
* NUMA hinting. GUP must always take a fault so the access is
|
||||
* delivered to userfaultfd, regardless of FOLL_HONOR_NUMA_FAULT.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Only do so while the VMA is accessible. If it has been made
|
||||
* inaccessible (e.g. mprotect(PROT_NONE)), fall through to the guard
|
||||
* below: forcing a fault there would loop, as handle_mm_fault() makes
|
||||
* no progress on protnone in an inaccessible VMA, and the access is
|
||||
* denied regardless of RWP anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (vma_test_single_mask(vma, VMA_UFFD_RWP) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If callers don't want to honor NUMA hinting faults, no need to
|
||||
* determine if we would actually have to trigger a NUMA hinting fault.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1893,8 +1893,11 @@ static enum scan_result try_collapse_pte_mapped_thp(struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
|
|||
if (!thp_vma_allowable_order(vma, vma->vm_flags, TVA_FORCED_COLLAPSE, PMD_ORDER))
|
||||
return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Keep pmd pgtable for uffd-wp; see comment in retract_page_tables() */
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_wp(vma))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Keep pmd pgtable while the uffd bit is in use; see comment in
|
||||
* retract_page_tables().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_protected(vma))
|
||||
return SCAN_PTE_UFFD;
|
||||
|
||||
folio = filemap_lock_folio(vma->vm_file->f_mapping,
|
||||
|
|
@ -2107,13 +2110,14 @@ static bool file_backed_vma_is_retractable(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When a vma is registered with uffd-wp, we cannot recycle
|
||||
* When a vma is registered with uffd-wp or RWP, we cannot recycle
|
||||
* the page table because there may be pte markers installed.
|
||||
* Other vmas can still have the same file mapped hugely, but
|
||||
* skip this one: it will always be mapped in small page size
|
||||
* for uffd-wp registered ranges.
|
||||
* VM_UFFD_RWP ranges similarly rely on per-PTE uffd state
|
||||
* and cannot be recycled to a shared PMD. Other vmas can still
|
||||
* have the same file mapped hugely, but skip this one: it will
|
||||
* always be mapped in small page size for these registrations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_wp(vma))
|
||||
if (userfaultfd_protected(vma))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user