From afdc74ed2d57e86c10b1d6831339770a802bab9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Chancellor Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:50:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi: Fix operator precedence in sunxi_divs_clk_setup r375326 in Clang exposes an issue with operator precedence in sunxi_div_clk_setup: drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: warning: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '|'; '|' will be evaluated first [-Wbitwise-conditional-parentheses] data->div[i].critical ? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around the '|' expression to silence this warning data->div[i].critical ? ^ ) drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c:1083:30: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first data->div[i].critical ? ^ ( 1 warning generated. It appears that the intention was for ?: to be evaluated first so that CLK_IS_CRITICAL could be added to clkflags if the critical boolean was set; right now, | is being evaluated first. Add parentheses around the ?: block to have it be evaluated first. Fixes: 9919d44ff297 ("clk: sunxi: Use CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for critical clks") Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/745 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c index d3a43381a792..27201fd26e44 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c @@ -1080,8 +1080,8 @@ static struct clk ** __init sunxi_divs_clk_setup(struct device_node *node, rate_hw, rate_ops, gate_hw, &clk_gate_ops, clkflags | - data->div[i].critical ? - CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0); + (data->div[i].critical ? + CLK_IS_CRITICAL : 0)); WARN_ON(IS_ERR(clk_data->clks[i])); } From cdfc2e2086bf9c465f44e2db25561373b084a113 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Ian King Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:28:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi-ng: a80: fix the zero'ing of bits 16 and 18 The zero'ing of bits 16 and 18 is incorrect. Currently the code is masking with the bitwise-and of BIT(16) & BIT(18) which is 0, so the updated value for val is always zero. Fix this by bitwise and-ing value with the correct mask that will zero bits 16 and 18. Addresses-Coverity: (" Suspicious &= or |= constant expression") Fixes: b8eb71dcdd08 ("clk: sunxi-ng: Add A80 CCU") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80.c index dcac1391767f..ef29582676f6 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80.c +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun9i-a80.c @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ static int sun9i_a80_ccu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Enforce d1 = 0, d2 = 0 for Audio PLL */ val = readl(reg + SUN9I_A80_PLL_AUDIO_REG); - val &= (BIT(16) & BIT(18)); + val &= ~(BIT(16) | BIT(18)); writel(val, reg + SUN9I_A80_PLL_AUDIO_REG); /* Enforce P = 1 for both CPU cluster PLLs */