mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 02:24:24 +02:00
Merge branch 'xfrm: fixes for xfrm_state_find under preemption'
Sabrina Dubroca says: ==================== While looking at the pcpu_id changes, I found two issues that can happen if we get preempted and the cpu_id changes. The second patch takes care of both problems. The first patch also makes sure we don't use state_ptrs uninitialized, which could currently happen. syzbot seems to have hit this issue [1]. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7ed9d47e15e88581dc5b ==================== Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
commit
766f6a784b
|
|
@ -1307,14 +1307,8 @@ static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(struct net *net, int have_hash_collision)
|
|||
static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
|
||||
const struct flowi *fl, unsigned short family,
|
||||
struct xfrm_state **best, int *acq_in_progress,
|
||||
int *error)
|
||||
int *error, unsigned int pcpu_id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
|
||||
* we don't require it to be stable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
unsigned int pcpu_id = get_cpu();
|
||||
put_cpu();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Resolution logic:
|
||||
* 1. There is a valid state with matching selector. Done.
|
||||
* 2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1381,14 +1375,15 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
/* We need the cpu id just as a lookup key,
|
||||
* we don't require it to be stable.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pcpu_id = get_cpu();
|
||||
put_cpu();
|
||||
pcpu_id = raw_smp_processor_id();
|
||||
|
||||
to_put = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
sequence = read_seqcount_begin(&net->xfrm.xfrm_state_hash_generation);
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
xfrm_hash_ptrs_get(net, &state_ptrs);
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, &pol->state_cache_list, state_cache) {
|
||||
if (x->props.family == encap_family &&
|
||||
x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid &&
|
||||
|
|
@ -1400,7 +1395,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
|
||||
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
|
||||
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, encap_family,
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (best)
|
||||
|
|
@ -1417,7 +1412,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
|
||||
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
|
||||
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cached:
|
||||
|
|
@ -1429,8 +1424,6 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
else if (acquire_in_progress) /* XXX: acquire_in_progress should not happen */
|
||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_hash_ptrs_get(net, &state_ptrs);
|
||||
|
||||
h = __xfrm_dst_hash(daddr, saddr, tmpl->reqid, encap_family, state_ptrs.hmask);
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, state_ptrs.bydst + h, bydst) {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD
|
||||
|
|
@ -1460,7 +1453,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
|
||||
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
|
||||
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (best || acquire_in_progress)
|
||||
goto found;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1495,7 +1488,7 @@ xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr, const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
|
|||
tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
|
||||
(tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
|
||||
xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family,
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
|
||||
&best, &acquire_in_progress, &error, pcpu_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
found:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user