wifi: iwlwifi: tighten flags in debugfs command sending

The only flags that could reasonably be used here are
CMD_WANT_SKB and CMD_ASYNC, CMD_SEND_IN_RFKILL doesn't
really make sense and CMD_BLOCK_TXQS just triggers a
warning, as does CMD_WANT_SKB | CMD_ASYNC.

Clear CMD_WANT_SKB since the response SKB isn't used
anyway, and refuse flags other than CMD_ASYNC to avoid
the warnings or other issues.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512222731.71b8cda9c4e8.I0cccfd67675989b48d003833f5813c8fbded45a6@changeid
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Berg 2026-05-12 22:34:28 +03:00 committed by Miri Korenblit
parent e2323929a6
commit 764a3a1b42

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
/*
* Copyright (C) 2012-2014, 2018-2024 Intel Corporation
* Copyright (C) 2012-2014, 2018-2024, 2026 Intel Corporation
* Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH
* Copyright (C) 2016-2017 Intel Deutschland GmbH
*/
@ -275,16 +275,19 @@ static ssize_t iwl_dbgfs_send_hcmd_write(struct iwl_fw_runtime *fwrt, char *buf,
goto out;
}
/* ignore this flag, we cannot use the response */
hcmd.flags &= ~CMD_WANT_SKB;
/* reject flags other than async, they cannot be used this way */
if (hcmd.flags & ~CMD_ASYNC) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
if (fwrt->ops && fwrt->ops->send_hcmd)
ret = fwrt->ops->send_hcmd(fwrt->ops_ctx, &hcmd);
else
ret = -EPERM;
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (hcmd.flags & CMD_WANT_SKB)
iwl_free_resp(&hcmd);
out:
kfree(data);
return ret ?: count;