mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-27 17:47:41 +02:00
mm/mglru: use the common routine for dirty/writeback reactivation
Currently MGLRU will move the dirty writeback folios to the second oldest gen instead of reactivate them like the classical LRU. This might help to reduce the LRU contention as it skipped the isolation. But as a result we will see these folios at the LRU tail more frequently leading to inefficient reclaim. Besides, the dirty / writeback check after isolation in shrink_folio_list is more accurate and covers more cases. So instead, just drop the special handling for dirty writeback, use the common routine and re-activate it like the classical LRU. This should in theory improve the scan efficiency. These folios will be rotated back to LRU tail once writeback is done so there is no risk of hotness inversion. And now each reclaim loop will have a higher success rate. This also prepares for unifying the writeback and throttling mechanism with classical LRU, we keep these folios far from tail so detecting the tail batch will have a similar pattern with classical LRU. The micro optimization that avoids LRU contention by skipping the isolation is gone, which should be fine. Compared to IO and writeback cost, the isolation overhead is trivial. And using the common routine also keeps the folio's referenced bits (tier bits), which could improve metrics in the long term. Also no more need to clean reclaim bit as the common routine will make use of it. Note the common routine updates a few throttling and writeback counters, which are not used, and never have been for the MGLRU case. We will start making use of these in later commits. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260428-mglru-reclaim-v7-10-02fabb92dc43@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org> Cc: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Leno Hou <lenohou@gmail.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: Yafang <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
acd22fbb9f
commit
75d4c3f5fb
19
mm/vmscan.c
19
mm/vmscan.c
|
|
@ -4582,7 +4582,6 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_c
|
|||
int tier_idx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool success;
|
||||
bool dirty, writeback;
|
||||
int gen = folio_lru_gen(folio);
|
||||
int type = folio_is_file_lru(folio);
|
||||
int zone = folio_zonenum(folio);
|
||||
|
|
@ -4632,21 +4631,6 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_c
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dirty = folio_test_dirty(folio);
|
||||
writeback = folio_test_writeback(folio);
|
||||
if (type == LRU_GEN_FILE && dirty) {
|
||||
sc->nr.file_taken += delta;
|
||||
if (!writeback)
|
||||
sc->nr.unqueued_dirty += delta;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* waiting for writeback */
|
||||
if (writeback || (type == LRU_GEN_FILE && dirty)) {
|
||||
gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, true);
|
||||
list_move(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -4668,9 +4652,6 @@ static bool isolate_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct sca
|
|||
if (!folio_test_referenced(folio))
|
||||
set_mask_bits(&folio->flags.f, LRU_REFS_MASK, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* for shrink_folio_list() */
|
||||
folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
|
||||
|
||||
success = lru_gen_del_folio(lruvec, folio, true);
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!success, folio);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user