bpf: Fix percpu map update indexing with sparse CPU IDs

Per-CPU array, hash, and cgroup storage map updates without BPF_F_CPU
or BPF_F_ALL_CPUS use a value buffer whose per-CPU slots are packed in
possible-CPU order. The buffer is sized as:

  round_up(value_size, 8) * num_possible_cpus()

The update paths iterate over possible CPUs, but use the logical CPU ID
to calculate the source offset:

  value + size * cpu

This only works when possible CPU IDs are contiguous starting at zero.

For example, with a possible CPU mask of 0,2-3, the buffer contains
three slots corresponding to CPUs 0, 2, and 3. CPU2 is therefore
expected to use slot 1 and CPU3 slot 2. Instead, the current code uses
slots 2 and 3 respectively, causing incorrect per-CPU values and an
out-of-bounds read from the update buffer for CPU3.

The corresponding lookup paths already use a dense offset while
iterating over possible CPUs. Do the same for the array, hash, and
cgroup storage update paths, advancing the source offset once for each
possible CPU. BPF_F_ALL_CPUS continues to use the same value for every
CPU.

Fixes: 8eb76cb03f ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_array maps")
Fixes: c6936161fd ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_hash and lru_percpu_hash maps")
Fixes: 47c79f05aa ("bpf: Add BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags support for percpu_cgroup_storage maps")
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260813155131.1022745-3-sh_def@163.com
This commit is contained in:
Hui Su 2026-08-13 23:51:33 +08:00 committed by Andrii Nakryiko
parent ed54bf564a
commit 75b0a6db43
3 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
void __percpu *pptr;
void *ptr, *val;
u32 size;
int cpu;
int cpu, off = 0;
if (unlikely((map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) || (u32)map_flags > BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
/* unknown flags */
@ -468,9 +468,10 @@ int bpf_percpu_array_update(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
}
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
ptr = per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu);
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + off;
copy_map_value(map, ptr, val);
bpf_obj_cancel_fields(map, ptr);
off += size;
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();

View File

@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
} else {
u32 size = round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
void *val;
int cpu;
int cpu, off = 0;
if (map_flags & BPF_F_CPU) {
cpu = map_flags >> 32;
@ -1037,9 +1037,10 @@ static void pcpu_copy_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, void __percpu *pptr,
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
ptr = per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu);
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + off;
copy_map_value(&htab->map, ptr, val);
bpf_obj_cancel_fields(&htab->map, ptr);
off += size;
}
}
}

View File

@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
void *val;
u32 size;
int cpu;
int cpu, off = 0;
if ((u32)map_flags & ~(BPF_ANY | BPF_EXIST | BPF_F_CPU | BPF_F_ALL_CPUS))
return -EINVAL;
@ -245,8 +245,9 @@ int bpf_percpu_cgroup_storage_update(struct bpf_map *_map, void *key,
}
size = round_up(_map->value_size, 8);
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + size * cpu;
val = (map_flags & BPF_F_ALL_CPUS) ? value : value + off;
copy_map_value(_map, per_cpu_ptr(storage->percpu_buf, cpu), val);
off += size;
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();