mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-08-02 05:12:01 +02:00
staging: lustre: osc: osc_match_base prototype differs from declaration
The patch updates the prototype in osc_internal.h to match the
enums used in the declaration.
The osc_match_base declaration in lustre/osc/osc_request.c uses
enums for stricter checking on the type and mode parameters:
int osc_match_base(struct obd_export *exp,
...
--> enum ldlm_type type,
union ldlm_policy_data *policy,
--> enum ldlm_mode mode,
... int unref)
The prototype in lustre/osc/osc_internal.h instead used unsigned ints:
int osc_match_base(struct obd_export *exp,
...
--> __u32 type,
union ldlm_policy_data *policy,
--> __u32 mode,
... int unref);
Signed-off-by: Steve Guminski <stephenx.guminski@intel.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8189
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/23167
Reviewed-by: Frank Zago <fzago@cray.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Glossman <bob.glossman@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Eremin <dmitry.eremin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7cad16975
commit
7550387a6e
|
|
@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ int osc_enqueue_base(struct obd_export *exp, struct ldlm_res_id *res_id,
|
|||
struct ptlrpc_request_set *rqset, int async, int agl);
|
||||
|
||||
int osc_match_base(struct obd_export *exp, struct ldlm_res_id *res_id,
|
||||
__u32 type, union ldlm_policy_data *policy, __u32 mode,
|
||||
__u64 *flags, void *data, struct lustre_handle *lockh,
|
||||
int unref);
|
||||
enum ldlm_type type, union ldlm_policy_data *policy,
|
||||
enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 *flags, void *data,
|
||||
struct lustre_handle *lockh, int unref);
|
||||
|
||||
int osc_setattr_async(struct obd_export *exp, struct obdo *oa,
|
||||
obd_enqueue_update_f upcall, void *cookie,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user