mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 04:56:13 +02:00
bcachefs: Refactor memcpy into direct assignment
The memcpy() in bch2_bkey_append_ptr() is operating on an embedded fake
flexible array which looks to the compiler like it has 0 size. This
causes W=1 builds to emit warnings due to -Wstringop-overflow:
In file included from include/linux/string.h:254,
from include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
from include/linux/smp.h:13,
from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from include/linux/radix-tree.h:14,
from include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h:6,
from fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:182:
fs/bcachefs/extents.c: In function 'bch2_bkey_append_ptr':
include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: warning: writing 8 bytes into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
57 | #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy
| ^
include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:9: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
648 | __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
693 | #define memcpy(p, q, s) __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/bcachefs/extents.c:235:17: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
235 | memcpy((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k),
| ^~~~~~
fs/bcachefs/bcachefs_format.h:287:33: note: destination object 'v' of size 0
287 | struct bch_val v;
| ^
Avoid making any structure changes and just replace the u64 copy into a
direct assignment, side-stepping the entire problem.
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309192314.VBsjiIm5-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010235609.work.594-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
795413c548
commit
7413ab70cb
|
|
@ -633,6 +633,8 @@ void bch2_bkey_extent_entry_drop(struct bkey_i *, union bch_extent_entry *);
|
|||
|
||||
static inline void bch2_bkey_append_ptr(struct bkey_i *k, struct bch_extent_ptr ptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bch_extent_ptr *dest;
|
||||
|
||||
EBUG_ON(bch2_bkey_has_device(bkey_i_to_s(k), ptr.dev));
|
||||
|
||||
switch (k->k.type) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -642,12 +644,8 @@ static inline void bch2_bkey_append_ptr(struct bkey_i *k, struct bch_extent_ptr
|
|||
EBUG_ON(bkey_val_u64s(&k->k) >= BKEY_EXTENT_VAL_U64s_MAX);
|
||||
|
||||
ptr.type = 1 << BCH_EXTENT_ENTRY_ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
unsafe_memcpy((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k),
|
||||
&ptr,
|
||||
sizeof(ptr),
|
||||
"Our memcpy target is relative to a zero size array ,"
|
||||
"compiler bounds checking doesn't work here");
|
||||
dest = (struct bch_extent_ptr *)((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k));
|
||||
*dest = ptr;
|
||||
k->k.u64s++;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user