mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-01 11:03:43 +02:00
KVM: x86/xen: Fix SRCU/RCU usage in readers of evtchn_ports
The evtchnfd structure itself must be protected by either kvm->lock or
SRCU. Use the former in kvm_xen_eventfd_update(), since the lock is
being taken anyway; kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send() instead is a reader and
does not need kvm->lock, and is called in SRCU critical section from the
kvm_x86_handle_exit function.
It is also important to use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() in
kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send(), because idr_remove() will *not*
use synchronize_srcu() to wait for readers to complete.
Remove a superfluous if (kvm) check before calling synchronize_srcu()
in kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign() where kvm has been dereferenced already.
Co-developed-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20221226120320.1125390-3-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
92c58965e9
commit
70eae03087
|
|
@ -1808,20 +1808,23 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
{
|
||||
u32 port = data->u.evtchn.send_port;
|
||||
struct evtchnfd *evtchnfd;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!port || port >= max_evtchn_port(kvm))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Protect writes to evtchnfd as well as the idr lookup. */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
|
||||
evtchnfd = idr_find(&kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, port);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
if (!evtchnfd)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* For an UPDATE, nothing may change except the priority/vcpu */
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (evtchnfd->type != data->u.evtchn.type)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Port cannot change, and if it's zero that was an eventfd
|
||||
|
|
@ -1829,20 +1832,21 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_update(struct kvm *kvm,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
if (!evtchnfd->deliver.port.port ||
|
||||
evtchnfd->deliver.port.port != data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.port)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We only support 2 level event channels for now */
|
||||
if (data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.priority != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_XEN_EVTCHN_PRIO_2LEVEL)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
|
||||
evtchnfd->deliver.port.priority = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.priority;
|
||||
if (evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_id != data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.vcpu) {
|
||||
evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_id = data->u.evtchn.deliver.port.vcpu;
|
||||
evtchnfd->deliver.port.vcpu_idx = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
@ -1935,8 +1939,7 @@ static int kvm_xen_eventfd_deassign(struct kvm *kvm, u32 port)
|
|||
if (!evtchnfd)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
||||
if (kvm)
|
||||
synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu);
|
||||
synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu);
|
||||
if (!evtchnfd->deliver.port.port)
|
||||
eventfd_ctx_put(evtchnfd->deliver.eventfd.ctx);
|
||||
kfree(evtchnfd);
|
||||
|
|
@ -1989,14 +1992,18 @@ static bool kvm_xen_hcall_evtchn_send(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 param, u64 *r)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Sanity check: this structure is the same for 32-bit and 64-bit */
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(send) != 4);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kvm_read_guest_virt(vcpu, param, &send, sizeof(send), &e)) {
|
||||
*r = -EFAULT;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The evtchn_ports idr is protected by vcpu->kvm->srcu */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* evtchnfd is protected by kvm->srcu; the idr lookup instead
|
||||
* is protected by RCU.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
evtchnfd = idr_find(&vcpu->kvm->arch.xen.evtchn_ports, send.port);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
if (!evtchnfd)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user