mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-11-06 21:58:01 +01:00
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_throw() in a prog with a private stack
'Private stack, exception in main prog' and 'Private stack, exception in subprog' are fentry progs. The test loader does not attach them, and BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN of a fentry prog does not call the prog. They are loaded, but they never run. Add three raw_tp progs. BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN runs them, and the default exception callback returns the cookie of bpf_throw(): - the main prog has a private stack and throws - the main prog has a private stack, its subprog throws - the main prog has no private stack, its subprog has one and throws Without the fix of the x86-64 JIT the first two crash the kernel. The third one passes with and without it: it makes sure that only the frame of the main prog is taken into account. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261031050558.2410721-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
91068ed2d3
commit
6cc0cf0a6f
|
|
@ -279,6 +279,105 @@ int private_stack_exception_sub_prog(void)
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Nothing attaches the two fentry progs above, so they are loaded, but never
|
||||
* run. BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN does run a raw_tp prog. The default exception callback
|
||||
* returns the cookie of bpf_throw().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SEC("raw_tp")
|
||||
__description("Private stack, run, exception in main prog")
|
||||
__success __retval(1)
|
||||
__arch_x86_64
|
||||
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
|
||||
__jited(" movl $0x1, %edi")
|
||||
__jited(" pushq %r9")
|
||||
__jited("...")
|
||||
__jited(" callq")
|
||||
__naked void private_stack_run_exception_main_prog(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
r1 = 42; \
|
||||
*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1; \
|
||||
r1 = 1; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_throw]; \
|
||||
r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" :
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_throw)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__used
|
||||
__naked static void subprog_throw(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
r1 = 2; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_throw]; \
|
||||
r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" :
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_throw)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SEC("raw_tp")
|
||||
__description("Private stack, run, exception in subprog")
|
||||
__success __retval(2)
|
||||
__arch_x86_64
|
||||
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
|
||||
__jited(" pushq %r9")
|
||||
__jited("...")
|
||||
__jited(" callq")
|
||||
__jited(" popq %r9")
|
||||
__naked void private_stack_run_exception_sub_prog(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
r1 = 42; \
|
||||
*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1; \
|
||||
call subprog_throw; \
|
||||
r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" ::: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__used
|
||||
__naked static void private_stack_subprog_throw(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
r1 = 42; \
|
||||
*(u64 *)(r10 - 512) = r1; \
|
||||
r1 = 3; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_throw]; \
|
||||
r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" :
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_throw)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only the frame of the main prog counts, and it has nothing pushed at the call */
|
||||
SEC("raw_tp")
|
||||
__description("Private stack, run, exception in subprog, no private stack in main prog")
|
||||
__success __retval(3)
|
||||
__arch_x86_64
|
||||
__jited(" subq $0x8, %rsp")
|
||||
__jited("...")
|
||||
__jited("func #1")
|
||||
__jited("...")
|
||||
__jited(" movq %rdi, -0x200(%r9)")
|
||||
__jited(" movl $0x3, %edi")
|
||||
__jited(" pushq %r9")
|
||||
__naked void no_private_stack_run_exception_sub_prog(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
r1 = 42; \
|
||||
*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1; \
|
||||
call private_stack_subprog_throw; \
|
||||
r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" ::: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int glob;
|
||||
__noinline static void subprog2(int *val)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user