mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-25 07:33:19 +02:00
btrfs: zoned: fix stripe width calculation
The stripe offset calculation in the zoned code for raid0 and raid10
wrongly uses map->stripe_size to calculate it. In fact, map->stripe_size is
the size of the device extent composing the block group, which always is
the zone_size on the zoned setup.
Fix it by using BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN and BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT. Also, optimize
the calculation a bit by doing the common calculation only once.
Fixes: c0d90a79e8 ("btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.17+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
94f54924b9
commit
6a1ab50135
|
|
@ -1523,6 +1523,8 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
|
|||
u64 last_alloc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
|
||||
u64 stripe_nr = 0, stripe_offset = 0;
|
||||
u32 stripe_index = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree",
|
||||
|
|
@ -1530,28 +1532,26 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (last_alloc) {
|
||||
u32 factor = map->num_stripes;
|
||||
|
||||
stripe_nr = last_alloc >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT;
|
||||
stripe_offset = last_alloc & BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK;
|
||||
stripe_nr = div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, factor, &stripe_index);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
|
||||
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) {
|
||||
u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr;
|
||||
u64 stripe_offset;
|
||||
int stripe_index;
|
||||
|
||||
stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size);
|
||||
stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
|
||||
full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes);
|
||||
div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes, &stripe_index);
|
||||
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset =
|
||||
full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(stripe_nr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (stripe_index > i)
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size;
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
|
||||
else if (stripe_index == i)
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset +=
|
||||
(last_alloc - stripe_offset);
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += stripe_offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(0, active) != test_bit(i, active)) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1575,6 +1575,8 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
|
|||
u64 last_alloc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
|
||||
u64 stripe_nr = 0, stripe_offset = 0;
|
||||
u32 stripe_index = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree",
|
||||
|
|
@ -1582,6 +1584,14 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (last_alloc) {
|
||||
u32 factor = map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes;
|
||||
|
||||
stripe_nr = last_alloc >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT;
|
||||
stripe_offset = last_alloc & BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_MASK;
|
||||
stripe_nr = div_u64_rem(stripe_nr, factor, &stripe_index);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
|
||||
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1595,26 +1605,12 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid10(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) {
|
||||
u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr;
|
||||
u64 stripe_offset;
|
||||
int stripe_index;
|
||||
|
||||
stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size);
|
||||
stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
|
||||
full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr,
|
||||
map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes);
|
||||
div_u64_rem(stripe_nr,
|
||||
(map->num_stripes / map->sub_stripes),
|
||||
&stripe_index);
|
||||
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset =
|
||||
full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset = btrfs_stripe_nr_to_offset(stripe_nr);
|
||||
|
||||
if (stripe_index > (i / map->sub_stripes))
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size;
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
|
||||
else if (stripe_index == (i / map->sub_stripes))
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset +=
|
||||
(last_alloc - stripe_offset);
|
||||
zone_info[i].alloc_offset += stripe_offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((i % map->sub_stripes) == 0) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user