mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-01 19:13:47 +02:00
RDMA: hfi1: fix possible divide-by-zero in find_hw_thread_mask()
The function divides number of online CPUs by num_core_siblings, and later checks the divider by zero. This implies a possibility to get and divide-by-zero runtime error. Fix it by moving the check prior to division. This also helps to save one indentation level. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov [NVIDIA] <yury.norov@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250604193947.11834-3-yury.norov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
16e2707cf1
commit
59f7d21385
|
|
@ -964,31 +964,35 @@ static void find_hw_thread_mask(uint hw_thread_no, cpumask_var_t hw_thread_mask,
|
|||
struct hfi1_affinity_node_list *affinity)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int possible, curr_cpu, i;
|
||||
uint num_cores_per_socket = node_affinity.num_online_cpus /
|
||||
uint num_cores_per_socket;
|
||||
|
||||
cpumask_copy(hw_thread_mask, &affinity->proc.mask);
|
||||
|
||||
if (affinity->num_core_siblings == 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
num_cores_per_socket = node_affinity.num_online_cpus /
|
||||
affinity->num_core_siblings /
|
||||
node_affinity.num_online_nodes;
|
||||
|
||||
cpumask_copy(hw_thread_mask, &affinity->proc.mask);
|
||||
if (affinity->num_core_siblings > 0) {
|
||||
/* Removing other siblings not needed for now */
|
||||
possible = cpumask_weight(hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_first(hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
for (i = 0;
|
||||
i < num_cores_per_socket * node_affinity.num_online_nodes;
|
||||
i++)
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_next(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
/* Removing other siblings not needed for now */
|
||||
possible = cpumask_weight(hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_first(hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
for (i = 0;
|
||||
i < num_cores_per_socket * node_affinity.num_online_nodes;
|
||||
i++)
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_next(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
|
||||
for (; i < possible; i++) {
|
||||
cpumask_clear_cpu(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_next(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Identifying correct HW threads within physical cores */
|
||||
cpumask_shift_left(hw_thread_mask, hw_thread_mask,
|
||||
num_cores_per_socket *
|
||||
node_affinity.num_online_nodes *
|
||||
hw_thread_no);
|
||||
for (; i < possible; i++) {
|
||||
cpumask_clear_cpu(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
curr_cpu = cpumask_next(curr_cpu, hw_thread_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Identifying correct HW threads within physical cores */
|
||||
cpumask_shift_left(hw_thread_mask, hw_thread_mask,
|
||||
num_cores_per_socket *
|
||||
node_affinity.num_online_nodes *
|
||||
hw_thread_no);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int hfi1_get_proc_affinity(int node)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user