mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-31 11:37:06 +02:00
drm/i915/bios: Define ALM only VBT block 9 contents
For some reason ALM VBT has two dot clock override tables. One as the normal block 15 and a second one as block 9. The table in block 9 has no row_size/num_rows information. On my Fujitsu Lifebook S6010 only the block 9 table has actual data in it. Block 15 is present but all zeroes. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240503122449.27266-17-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7d5b5ff08
commit
55c6b98676
|
|
@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ enum bdb_block_id {
|
|||
BDB_EXT_MMIO_REGS = 6, /* VBIOS only */
|
||||
BDB_SWF_IO = 7, /* VBIOS only */
|
||||
BDB_SWF_MMIO = 8, /* VBIOS only */
|
||||
BDB_DOT_CLOCK_OVERRIDE_ALM = 9,
|
||||
BDB_PSR = 9, /* 165+ */
|
||||
BDB_MODE_REMOVAL_TABLE = 10,
|
||||
BDB_CHILD_DEVICE_TABLE = 11,
|
||||
|
|
@ -650,6 +651,25 @@ struct bdb_reg_table {
|
|||
/* u16 table_end_marker; */
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Block 9 - Undocumented table (ALM only)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
struct dot_clock_override_entry_gen2 {
|
||||
u32 dotclock;
|
||||
u8 n;
|
||||
u8 m1;
|
||||
u8 m2;
|
||||
u8 p1:5;
|
||||
u8 p1_div_by_2:1;
|
||||
u8 reserved:1;
|
||||
u8 p2_div_by_4:1;
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
struct bdb_dot_clock_override_alm {
|
||||
struct dot_clock_override_entry_gen2 t[0];
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Block 9 - SRD Feature Block
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
@ -801,17 +821,6 @@ struct bdb_driver_persistence {
|
|||
* Block 15 - Dot Clock Override Table
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
struct dot_clock_override_entry_gen2 {
|
||||
u32 dotclock;
|
||||
u8 n;
|
||||
u8 m1;
|
||||
u8 m2;
|
||||
u8 p1:5;
|
||||
u8 p1_div_by_2:1;
|
||||
u8 reserved:1;
|
||||
u8 p2_div_by_4:1;
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
struct dot_clock_override_entry_gen3 {
|
||||
u32 dotclock;
|
||||
u8 n;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user