mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-08-08 16:37:47 +02:00
drm/komeda: Annotate dma-fence critical section in commit path
Like the helpers, nothing special. Well except not, because we the critical section extends until after hw_done(), since that's the last thing which could hold up a subsequent atomic commit. That means the wait_for_flip_done is included, but that's not a problem, we're allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from signalling critical sections. Even on our own fence (which this does), it's just a bit confusing. But in a way those last 2 function calls are already part of the fence signalling critical section for the next atomic commit. Reading this I'm wondering why komeda waits for flip_done() before calling hw_done(), which is a bit backwards (but hey hw can be special). Might be good to throw a comment in there that explains why, because the original commit that added this just doesn't. v2: Small rebase Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang <james.qian.wang@arm.com> (v1) Cc: "James (Qian) Wang" <james.qian.wang@arm.com> Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Cc: Mihail Atanassov <mihail.atanassov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210121152959.1725404-5-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e5eb5e1b6
commit
53fc08c23a
|
|
@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static const struct drm_driver komeda_kms_driver = {
|
|||
static void komeda_kms_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_device *dev = old_state->dev;
|
||||
bool fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
|
||||
|
||||
drm_atomic_helper_commit_modeset_disables(dev, old_state);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ static void komeda_kms_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state)
|
|||
|
||||
drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done(dev, old_state);
|
||||
|
||||
dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
|
||||
|
||||
drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes(dev, old_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user