mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-31 19:47:08 +02:00
Merge branch 'bpf-support-for-non_null-ptr-detection-with-jeq-jne-with-register-operand'
Cupertino Miranda says: ==================== bpf: support for non_null ptr detection with JEQ/JNE with register operand Changes from v1: - Corrected typos in commit messages. - Fixed indentation. - Replaced text by simpler version suggested by Eduard. Changes from v2: - Small fixes after AI patch checker complaints. Changes from v3: - Removed log file. No idea how that got added. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260304195018.181396-1-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
commit
437350df86
|
|
@ -17678,12 +17678,15 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* detect if R == 0 where R is returned from bpf_map_lookup_elem().
|
||||
* Also does the same detection for a register whose the value is
|
||||
* known to be 0.
|
||||
* NOTE: these optimizations below are related with pointer comparison
|
||||
* which will never be JMP32.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!is_jmp32 && BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K &&
|
||||
insn->imm == 0 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
|
||||
type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type)) {
|
||||
if (!is_jmp32 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE) &&
|
||||
type_may_be_null(dst_reg->type) &&
|
||||
((BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K && insn->imm == 0) ||
|
||||
(BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X && register_is_null(src_reg)))) {
|
||||
/* Mark all identical registers in each branch as either
|
||||
* safe or unknown depending R == 0 or R != 0 conditional.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -210,4 +210,58 @@ l0_%=: /* return 0; */ \
|
|||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Verified that we can detect the pointer as non_null when comparing with
|
||||
* register with value 0. JEQ test case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SEC("xdp")
|
||||
__success __log_level(2)
|
||||
/* to make sure the branch is not falsely predicted*/
|
||||
__msg("r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
|
||||
__msg("from 7 to 9")
|
||||
__naked void jeq_reg_reg_null_check(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
*(u32*)(r10 - 8) = 0; \
|
||||
r1 = %[map_xskmap] ll; \
|
||||
r2 = r10; \
|
||||
r2 += -8; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
|
||||
r1 = 0; \
|
||||
if r0 == r1 goto 1f; \
|
||||
r0 = *(u32*)(r0 +0); \
|
||||
1: r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" :
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
__imm_addr(map_xskmap)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Same as above but for JNE.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SEC("xdp")
|
||||
__success __log_level(2)
|
||||
/* to make sure the branch is not falsely predicted*/
|
||||
__msg("r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
|
||||
__msg("from 7 to 9")
|
||||
__naked void jne_reg_reg_null_check(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
asm volatile (" \
|
||||
*(u32*)(r10 - 8) = 0; \
|
||||
r1 = %[map_xskmap] ll; \
|
||||
r2 = r10; \
|
||||
r2 += -8; \
|
||||
call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
|
||||
r1 = 0; \
|
||||
if r0 != r1 goto 1f; \
|
||||
goto 2f; \
|
||||
1: r0 = *(u32*)(r0 +0); \
|
||||
2: r0 = 0; \
|
||||
exit; \
|
||||
" :
|
||||
: __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
|
||||
__imm_addr(map_xskmap)
|
||||
: __clobber_all);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user