x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()

Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.

Fix the comment. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Kirill A. Shutemov 2023-01-27 01:11:53 +03:00 committed by Dave Hansen
parent 5dc4c995db
commit 3543f8830b

View File

@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__tdx_hypercall)
tdcall
/*
* RAX==0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
* RAX!=0 indicates a failure of the TDVMCALL mechanism itself and that
* something has gone horribly wrong with the TDX module.
*
* The return status of the hypercall operation is in a separate