mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-30 01:53:29 +02:00
net: avoid irqsave in skb_defer_free_flush
The spin_lock irqsave/restore API variant in skb_defer_free_flush can be replaced with the faster spin_lock irq variant, which doesn't need to read and restore the CPU flags. Using the unconditional irq "disable/enable" API variant is safe, because the skb_defer_free_flush() function is only called during NAPI-RX processing in net_rx_action(), where it is known the IRQs are enabled. Expected gain is 14 cycles from avoiding reading and restoring CPU flags in a spin_lock_irqsave/restore operation, measured via a microbencmark kernel module[1] on CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz. Microbenchmark overhead of spin_lock+unlock: - spin_lock_unlock_irq cost: 34 cycles(tsc) 9.486 ns - spin_lock_unlock_irqsave cost: 48 cycles(tsc) 13.567 ns We don't expect to see a measurable packet performance gain, as skb_defer_free_flush() is called infrequently once per NIC device NAPI bulk cycle and conditionally only if SKBs have been deferred by other CPUs via skb_attempt_defer_free(). [1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/time_bench_sample.c Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167421646327.1321776.7390743166998776914.stgit@firesoul Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
695a376b59
commit
3176eb8268
|
|
@ -6616,17 +6616,16 @@ static int napi_threaded_poll(void *data)
|
|||
static void skb_defer_free_flush(struct softnet_data *sd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb, *next;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Paired with WRITE_ONCE() in skb_attempt_defer_free() */
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(sd->defer_list))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&sd->defer_lock, flags);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&sd->defer_lock);
|
||||
skb = sd->defer_list;
|
||||
sd->defer_list = NULL;
|
||||
sd->defer_count = 0;
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sd->defer_lock, flags);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&sd->defer_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
while (skb != NULL) {
|
||||
next = skb->next;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user