x86/alternatives: Remove 'smp_text_poke_batch_flush()'

It only has a single user left, merge it into smp_text_poke_batch_add()
and remove the helper function.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411054105.2341982-50-mingo@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Ingo Molnar 2025-04-11 07:41:01 +02:00
parent b1bb39185d
commit 2c373ca064

View File

@ -2831,14 +2831,6 @@ void smp_text_poke_batch_finish(void)
smp_text_poke_batch_process();
}
static void smp_text_poke_batch_flush(void *addr)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
if (text_poke_array.nr_entries == TEXT_POKE_ARRAY_MAX || !text_poke_addr_ordered(addr))
smp_text_poke_batch_process();
}
/**
* smp_text_poke_batch_add() -- update instruction on live kernel on SMP, batched
* @addr: address to patch
@ -2854,7 +2846,8 @@ static void smp_text_poke_batch_flush(void *addr)
*/
void __ref smp_text_poke_batch_add(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, const void *emulate)
{
smp_text_poke_batch_flush(addr);
if (text_poke_array.nr_entries == TEXT_POKE_ARRAY_MAX || !text_poke_addr_ordered(addr))
smp_text_poke_batch_process();
__smp_text_poke_batch_add(addr, opcode, len, emulate);
}