mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-12 16:18:45 +02:00
rxrpc: Fix key/keyring checks in setsockopt(RXRPC_SECURITY_KEY/KEYRING)
An AF_RXRPC socket can be both client and server at the same time. When
sending new calls (ie. it's acting as a client), it uses rx->key to set the
security, and when accepting incoming calls (ie. it's acting as a server),
it uses rx->securities.
setsockopt(RXRPC_SECURITY_KEY) sets rx->key to point to an rxrpc-type key
and setsockopt(RXRPC_SECURITY_KEYRING) sets rx->securities to point to a
keyring of rxrpc_s-type keys.
Now, it should be possible to use both rx->key and rx->securities on the
same socket - but for userspace AF_RXRPC sockets rxrpc_setsockopt()
prevents that.
Fix this by:
(1) Remove the incorrect check rxrpc_setsockopt(RXRPC_SECURITY_KEYRING)
makes on rx->key.
(2) Move the check that rxrpc_setsockopt(RXRPC_SECURITY_KEY) makes on
rx->key down into rxrpc_request_key().
(3) Remove rxrpc_request_key()'s check on rx->securities.
This (in combination with a previous patch) pushes the checks down into the
functions that set those pointers and removes the cross-checks that prevent
both key and keyring being set.
Fixes: 17926a7932 ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260401105614.1696001-10-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
cc: Luxiao Xu <rakukuip@gmail.com>
cc: Yuan Tan <yuantan098@gmail.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408121252.2249051-16-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f125846ee7
commit
2afd86ccbb
|
|
@ -654,9 +654,6 @@ static int rxrpc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
|
|||
goto success;
|
||||
|
||||
case RXRPC_SECURITY_KEY:
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (rx->key)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
ret = -EISCONN;
|
||||
if (rx->sk.sk_state != RXRPC_UNBOUND)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
|
|
@ -664,9 +661,6 @@ static int rxrpc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
|
|||
goto error;
|
||||
|
||||
case RXRPC_SECURITY_KEYRING:
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (rx->key)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
ret = -EISCONN;
|
||||
if (rx->sk.sk_state != RXRPC_UNBOUND)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ int rxrpc_request_key(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, sockptr_t optval, int optlen)
|
|||
|
||||
_enter("");
|
||||
|
||||
if (optlen <= 0 || optlen > PAGE_SIZE - 1 || rx->securities)
|
||||
if (optlen <= 0 || optlen > PAGE_SIZE - 1 || rx->key)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
description = memdup_sockptr_nul(optval, optlen);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user