From 29213c00ccaa55e8ba01cfc79a93e000b0fcacc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:58:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] rust: pin-init: internal: pin_data: teach drop check about
 generics that cannot dangle

Lifetimes not needed by drop glue are considered by Rust's drop check to be
considered `#[may_dangle]`. In case for a self-referential struct, we may
have fields which need lifetime of borrowed fields in their drop glue, so
compiler's automatic check is insufficient.

Code like this:

    #[pin_data]
    struct SelfRef<'a> {
        borrow: PrintOnDrop<&'owner str>,
        owner: &'a str,
    }

may access `owner` during the drop, however Rust will determine that since
`'a` only is used in `owner`, the `'a` lifetime may dangle during drop.

This is undesirable for pin-init self references, because `&'a str` could
be coerced to `&'owner str` and this could further coerce if there're
implied outlives, e.g. `&'earlier_field &'owner ()` would allow `&'owner
str` to further coerce to `&'earlier_field`.

Thus, if any self-referential field require field lifetime access in `Drop`
impl, we would need to ensure that the all generic parameters visible by
self-referential fields would strictly outlive the struct. And this can be
done by a simple `Drop` impl that does nothing. Without a dropck eye patch,
presence of `Drop` impl, albeit empty, tells the drop check that the strict
outlive relation is needed.

Acked-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261008-dev-selfref-v2-5-e280b3c8fba5@garyguo.net/
Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
---
 rust/pin-init/src/__internal.rs | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/rust/pin-init/src/__internal.rs b/rust/pin-init/src/__internal.rs
index 74dc23506d97..32bd6d8c39a1 100644
--- a/rust/pin-init/src/__internal.rs
+++ b/rust/pin-init/src/__internal.rs
@@ -473,6 +473,35 @@ unsafe impl<F: EraseLt> Sync for Erase<F>
 #[repr(transparent)]
 pub struct Borrowed<T: ?Sized>(PhantomPinned, T);
 
+// Lifetimes not needed by drop glue are considered by Rust's drop check to be considered
+// `#[may_dangle]`. In case for a self-referential struct, we may have fields which need lifetime of
+// borrowed fields in their drop glue, so compiler's automatic check is insufficient.
+//
+// Code like this:
+// ```
+// #[pin_data]
+// struct SelfRef<'a> {
+//     borrow: PrintOnDrop<&'owner str>,
+//     owner: &'a str,
+// }
+// ```
+// may access `owner` during the drop, however Rust will determine that since `'a` only is used in
+// `owner`, the `'a` lifetime may dangle during drop.
+//
+// This is undesirable for pin-init self references, because `&'a str` could be coerecd to
+// `&'owner str` and this could further coerce if there're implied outlives, e.g.
+// `&'earlier_field &'owner ()` would allow `&'owner str` to further coerce to `&'earlier_field`.
+//
+// Thus, if any self-referential field require field lifetime access in `Drop` impl, we would need
+// to ensure that the all generic parameters visible by self-referential fields would strictly
+// outlive the struct. And this can be done by a simple `Drop` impl that does nothing. Without a
+// dropck eye patch, presence of `Drop` impl, albeit empty, tells the drop check that the strict
+// outlive relation is needed.
+impl<T: ?Sized> Drop for Borrowed<T> {
+    #[inline(always)]
+    fn drop(&mut self) {}
+}
+
 impl<T: ?Sized> Deref for Borrowed<T> {
     type Target = T;