mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-29 18:51:21 +02:00
sched/fair: Call update_curr() before unthrottling the hierarchy
Subsequent commits will allow update_curr() to throttle the hierarchy when the runtime accounting exceeds allocated quota. Call update_curr() before the unthrottle event, and in tg_unthrottle_up() to catch up on any remaining runtime and stabilize the "runtime_remaining" and "throttle_count" for that cfs_rq. Doing an update_curr() early ensures the cfs_rq is not throttled right back up again when the unthrottle is in progress. Since all callers of unthrottle_cfs_rq(), except two, already update the rq_clock and call rq_clock_start_loop_update(), move the update_rq_clock() from unthrottle_cfs_rq() to the callers that don't update the rq_clock. Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260602052531.11450-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
253edcf543
commit
28ad542768
|
|
@ -9859,11 +9859,14 @@ static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg,
|
|||
struct rq *rq = cfs_rq->rq;
|
||||
|
||||
guard(rq_lock_irq)(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = runtime_enabled;
|
||||
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->throttled)
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->throttled) {
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (runtime_was_enabled && !runtime_enabled)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6740,6 +6740,15 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
|
|||
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg_cfs_rq(tg, cpu_of(rq));
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, *tmp;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If cfs_rq->curr is set, the cfs_rq might not have caught up
|
||||
* since the last clock update. Do it now before we begin
|
||||
* queueing task onto it to save the need for unnecessarily
|
||||
* unthrottle the hierarchy for this cfs_rq to be throttled
|
||||
* right back again.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
update_curr(cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (--cfs_rq->throttle_count)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -6882,14 +6891,16 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
|||
* We can't unthrottle this cfs_rq without any runtime remaining because
|
||||
* any enqueue in tg_unthrottle_up() will immediately trigger a throttle,
|
||||
* which is not supposed to happen on unthrottle path.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Catch up on the remaining runtime since last clock update before
|
||||
* checking runtime remaining.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
update_curr(cfs_rq);
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->runtime_enabled && cfs_rq->runtime_remaining <= 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
cfs_rq->throttled = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &cfs_b->lock) {
|
||||
list_del_rcu(&cfs_rq->throttled_list);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -6964,6 +6975,7 @@ static inline void __unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
|||
bool first;
|
||||
|
||||
if (rq == this_rq()) {
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -7017,6 +7029,11 @@ static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
|
|||
if (!list_empty(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->curr) {
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
update_curr(cfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* By the above checks, this should never be true */
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user