mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-28 09:04:39 +02:00
wifi: cfg80211: don't apply HT flags to S1G channels
HT flags don't really make sense when applied to S1G channels especially given the bandwidths both used for calculations and conveyed (i.e 20MHz). Similarly with the 80/160/..MHz channels, each bonded subchannel is validated individually within cfg80211_s1g_usable(), so the regulatory validation is similarly redundant. Additionally, usermode application output (such as iwinfo below) doesn't particularly make sense when enumerating S1G channels: before: 925.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 47) [NO_HT40+, NO_HT40-, NO_16MHZ] 926.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 49) [NO_HT40+, NO_HT40-, NO_16MHZ] 927.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 51) [NO_HT40+, NO_HT40-, NO_16MHZ, NO_PRIMARY] after: 925.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 47) [NO_16MHZ] 926.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 49) [NO_16MHZ] 927.500 MHz (Band: 900 MHz, Channel 51) [NO_16MHZ, NO_PRIMARY] Don't process the S1G band when applying HT flags as both the regulatory component is redundant and the flags don't make sense for S1G channels. Signed-off-by: Lachlan Hodges <lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260113030934.18726-1-lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
669aa3e3fa
commit
24a5798567
|
|
@ -2332,8 +2332,17 @@ static void reg_process_ht_flags(struct wiphy *wiphy)
|
|||
if (!wiphy)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
for (band = 0; band < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; band++)
|
||||
for (band = 0; band < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; band++) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't apply HT flags to channels within the S1G band.
|
||||
* Each bonded channel will instead be validated individually
|
||||
* within cfg80211_s1g_usable().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (band == NL80211_BAND_S1GHZ)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
reg_process_ht_flags_band(wiphy, wiphy->bands[band]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool reg_wdev_chan_valid(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user