ASoC: codecs: wm8903: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()

We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from
snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered
through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through
snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets().

	(A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
	(B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component()

(B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in
ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly
using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA.
To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A).

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87jz0ynm6y.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kuninori Morimoto 2025-10-14 04:26:13 +00:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 7a0fefe28c
commit 18096d761f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 24D68B725D5487D0

View File

@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int wm8903_set_deemph(struct snd_soc_component *component)
static int wm8903_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8903_priv *wm8903 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8903->deemph;
@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int wm8903_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
static int wm8903_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8903_priv *wm8903 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
unsigned int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
int ret = 0;