mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 10:33:41 +02:00
ASoC: codecs: es8328: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(). (A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component() (B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component() (B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA. To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87ecr6ru3r.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ddd1705b62
commit
13c4c81b7b
|
|
@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int es8328_set_deemph(struct snd_soc_component *component)
|
|||
static int es8328_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
||||
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct es8328_priv *es8328 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
|
||||
|
||||
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = es8328->deemph;
|
||||
|
|
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int es8328_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
|||
static int es8328_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
||||
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct es8328_priv *es8328 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
|
||||
unsigned int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user