mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-29 17:43:52 +02:00
nfs: make nfs_set_verifier() safe for use in RCU pathwalk
nfs_set_verifier() relies upon dentry being pinned; if that's
the case, grabbing ->d_lock stabilizes ->d_parent and guarantees
that ->d_parent points to a positive dentry. For something
we'd run into in RCU mode that is *not* true - dentry might've
been through dentry_kill() just as we grabbed ->d_lock, with
its parent going through the same just as we get to into
nfs_set_verifier_locked(). It might get to detaching inode
(and zeroing ->d_inode) before nfs_set_verifier_locked() gets
to fetching that; we get an oops as the result.
That can happen in nfs{,4} ->d_revalidate(); the call chain in
question is nfs_set_verifier_locked() <- nfs_set_verifier() <-
nfs_lookup_revalidate_delegated() <- nfs{,4}_do_lookup_revalidate().
We have checked that the parent had been positive, but that's
done before we get to nfs_set_verifier() and it's possible for
memory pressure to pick our dentry as eviction candidate by that
time. If that happens, back-to-back attempts to kill dentry and
its parent are quite normal. Sure, in case of eviction we'll
fail the ->d_seq check in the caller, but we need to survive
until we return there...
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
275655d320
commit
10a973fc4f
|
|
@ -1431,9 +1431,9 @@ static bool nfs_verifier_is_delegated(struct dentry *dentry)
|
|||
static void nfs_set_verifier_locked(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned long verf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
|
||||
struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
|
||||
struct inode *dir = d_inode_rcu(dentry->d_parent);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!nfs_verify_change_attribute(dir, verf))
|
||||
if (!dir || !nfs_verify_change_attribute(dir, verf))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (inode && NFS_PROTO(inode)->have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ))
|
||||
nfs_set_verifier_delegated(&verf);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user