mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 18:43:33 +02:00
rcutorture: Update rcutorture_one_extend_check() for lazy preemption
The rcutorture_one_extend_check() function's last check assumes that if cur_ops->readlock_nesting() returns greater than zero, either the RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_1 or the RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_2 bit must be set, that is, there must be at least one rcu_read_lock() in effect. This works for preemptible RCU and for non-preemptible RCU running in a non-preemptible kernel. But it fails for non-preemptible RCU running in a preemptible kernel because then RCU's cur_ops->readlock_nesting() function, which is rcu_torture_readlock_nesting(), will return the PREEMPT_MASK mask bits from preempt_count(). The result will be greater than zero if preemption is disabled, including by the RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT and RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED bits. This commit therefore adjusts this check to take into account the case fo non-preemptible RCU running in a preemptible kernel. [boqun: Fix the if condition and add comment] Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202502171415.8ec87c87-lkp@intel.com Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fd858cc5a
commit
0be4b19edd
|
|
@ -1873,6 +1873,8 @@ static void rcu_torture_reader_do_mbchk(long myid, struct rcu_torture *rtp,
|
|||
#define ROEC_ARGS "%s %s: Current %#x To add %#x To remove %#x preempt_count() %#x\n", __func__, s, curstate, new, old, preempt_count()
|
||||
static void rcutorture_one_extend_check(char *s, int curstate, int new, int old, bool insoftirq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int mask;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_CHK_RDR_STATE))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1902,8 +1904,16 @@ static void rcutorture_one_extend_check(char *s, int curstate, int new, int old,
|
|||
WARN_ONCE(cur_ops->extendables &&
|
||||
!(curstate & (RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT | RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED)) &&
|
||||
(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK), ROEC_ARGS);
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(cur_ops->readlock_nesting &&
|
||||
!(curstate & (RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_1 | RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_2)) &&
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* non-preemptible RCU in a preemptible kernel uses "preempt_count() &
|
||||
* PREEMPT_MASK" as ->readlock_nesting().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mask = RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_1 | RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_2;
|
||||
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU))
|
||||
mask |= RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT | RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ONCE(cur_ops->readlock_nesting && !(curstate & mask) &&
|
||||
cur_ops->readlock_nesting() > 0, ROEC_ARGS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user