xfs: rename the old_crc variable in xlog_recover_process

old_crc is a very misleading name.  Rename it to expected_crc as that
described the usage much better.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig 2025-09-15 06:20:29 -07:00 committed by Carlos Maiolino
parent 3e5bdfe48e
commit 0b737f4ac1

View File

@ -2894,20 +2894,19 @@ xlog_recover_process(
int pass,
struct list_head *buffer_list)
{
__le32 old_crc = rhead->h_crc;
__le32 crc;
__le32 expected_crc = rhead->h_crc, crc;
crc = xlog_cksum(log, rhead, dp, be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len));
/*
* Nothing else to do if this is a CRC verification pass. Just return
* if this a record with a non-zero crc. Unfortunately, mkfs always
* sets old_crc to 0 so we must consider this valid even on v5 supers.
* Otherwise, return EFSBADCRC on failure so the callers up the stack
* know precisely what failed.
* sets expected_crc to 0 so we must consider this valid even on v5
* supers. Otherwise, return EFSBADCRC on failure so the callers up the
* stack know precisely what failed.
*/
if (pass == XLOG_RECOVER_CRCPASS) {
if (old_crc && crc != old_crc)
if (expected_crc && crc != expected_crc)
return -EFSBADCRC;
return 0;
}
@ -2918,11 +2917,11 @@ xlog_recover_process(
* zero CRC check prevents warnings from being emitted when upgrading
* the kernel from one that does not add CRCs by default.
*/
if (crc != old_crc) {
if (old_crc || xfs_has_crc(log->l_mp)) {
if (crc != expected_crc) {
if (expected_crc || xfs_has_crc(log->l_mp)) {
xfs_alert(log->l_mp,
"log record CRC mismatch: found 0x%x, expected 0x%x.",
le32_to_cpu(old_crc),
le32_to_cpu(expected_crc),
le32_to_cpu(crc));
xfs_hex_dump(dp, 32);
}