mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-24 07:03:03 +02:00
sched_ext: Fix processs_ddsp_deferred_locals() by unifying DTL_INVALID handling
With the preceding update, the only return value which makes meaningful
difference is DTL_INVALID, for which one caller, finish_dispatch(), falls
back to the global DSQ and the other, process_ddsp_deferred_locals(),
doesn't do anything.
It should always fallback to the global DSQ. Move the global DSQ fallback
into dispatch_to_local_dsq() and remove the return value.
v2: Patch title and description updated to reflect the behavior fix for
process_ddsp_deferred_locals().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e683949a4b
commit
0aab26309e
|
|
@ -2370,12 +2370,6 @@ static bool consume_dispatch_q(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret {
|
||||
DTL_DISPATCHED, /* successfully dispatched */
|
||||
DTL_LOST, /* lost race to dequeue */
|
||||
DTL_INVALID, /* invalid local dsq_id */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* dispatch_to_local_dsq - Dispatch a task to a local dsq
|
||||
* @rq: current rq which is locked
|
||||
|
|
@ -2390,9 +2384,8 @@ enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret {
|
|||
* The caller must have exclusive ownership of @p (e.g. through
|
||||
* %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static enum dispatch_to_local_dsq_ret
|
||||
dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
|
||||
static void dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
|
||||
struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rq *src_rq = task_rq(p);
|
||||
struct rq *dst_rq = container_of(dst_dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
|
||||
|
|
@ -2405,13 +2398,11 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
if (rq == src_rq && rq == dst_rq) {
|
||||
dispatch_enqueue(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
|
||||
return DTL_DISPATCHED;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
if (likely(task_can_run_on_remote_rq(p, dst_rq, true))) {
|
||||
bool dsp;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* @p is on a possibly remote @src_rq which we need to lock to
|
||||
* move the task. If dequeue is in progress, it'd be locking
|
||||
|
|
@ -2436,10 +2427,8 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* task_rq couldn't have changed if we're still the holding cpu */
|
||||
dsp = p->scx.holding_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id() &&
|
||||
!WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p));
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(dsp)) {
|
||||
if (likely(p->scx.holding_cpu == raw_smp_processor_id()) &&
|
||||
!WARN_ON_ONCE(src_rq != task_rq(p))) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If @p is staying on the same rq, there's no need to
|
||||
* go through the full deactivate/activate cycle.
|
||||
|
|
@ -2467,11 +2456,11 @@ dispatch_to_local_dsq(struct rq *rq, struct scx_dispatch_q *dst_dsq,
|
|||
raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return dsp ? DTL_DISPATCHED : DTL_LOST;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
|
||||
return DTL_INVALID;
|
||||
dispatch_enqueue(&scx_dsq_global, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
@ -2548,20 +2537,10 @@ static void finish_dispatch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
|
||||
dsq = find_dsq_for_dispatch(this_rq(), dsq_id, p);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL) {
|
||||
switch (dispatch_to_local_dsq(rq, dsq, p, enq_flags)) {
|
||||
case DTL_DISPATCHED:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case DTL_LOST:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case DTL_INVALID:
|
||||
dispatch_enqueue(&scx_dsq_global, p,
|
||||
enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL)
|
||||
dispatch_to_local_dsq(rq, dsq, p, enq_flags);
|
||||
else
|
||||
dispatch_enqueue(dsq, p, enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void flush_dispatch_buf(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user