mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 18:43:33 +02:00
selftests: fib-onlink: Remove "wrong nexthop device" IPv6 tests
The command in the test fails as expected because IPv6 forbids a nexthop device mismatch: # ./fib-onlink-tests.sh -v [...] COMMAND: ip -6 ro add table 1101 2001:db8:102::103/128 via 2001:db8:701::64 dev veth5 onlink Error: Nexthop has invalid gateway or device mismatch. TEST: Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device - VRF [ OK ] [...] Where: # ip route get 2001:db8:701::64 vrf lisa 2001:db8:701::64 dev veth7 table 1101 proto kernel src 2001:db8:701::1 metric 256 pref medium This is in contrast to IPv4 where a nexthop device mismatch is allowed when "onlink" is specified: # ip route get 169.254.7.2 vrf lisa 169.254.7.2 dev veth7 table 1101 src 169.254.7.1 uid 0 # ip ro add table 1101 169.254.102.103/32 via 169.254.7.2 dev veth5 onlink # echo $? 0 Remove these tests in preparation for aligning IPv6 with IPv4 and allowing nexthop device mismatch when "onlink" is specified. A subsequent patch will add tests that verify that both address families allow a nexthop device mismatch with "onlink". Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260111120813.159799-3-idosch@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5566f6b1d
commit
0a3419f4ba
|
|
@ -432,13 +432,6 @@ invalid_onlink_ipv6()
|
|||
|
||||
run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::101 ${V6ADDRS[p1]} "" 2 \
|
||||
"No nexthop device given"
|
||||
|
||||
# default VRF validation is done against LOCAL table
|
||||
# run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::102 ${V6ADDRS[p3]/::[0-9]/::64} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
|
||||
# "Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device"
|
||||
|
||||
run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::103 ${V6ADDRS[p7]/::[0-9]/::64} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
|
||||
"Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device - VRF"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
run_onlink_tests()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user