mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-06-01 19:13:47 +02:00
bpf: Fix compilation warning with -Wparentheses
The kernel test robot reported compilation warnings when -Wparentheses is
added to KBUILD_CFLAGS with gcc compiler. The following is the error message:
.../bpf-next/kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘coerce_reg_to_size_sx’:
.../bpf-next/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5901:14:
error: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ [-Werror=parentheses]
if (s64_max >= 0 == s64_min >= 0) {
~~~~~~~~^~~~
.../bpf-next/kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘coerce_subreg_to_size_sx’:
.../bpf-next/kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5965:14:
error: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of ‘==’ [-Werror=parentheses]
if (s32_min >= 0 == s32_max >= 0) {
~~~~~~~~^~~~
To fix the issue, add proper parentheses for the above '>=' condition
to silence the warning/error.
I tried a few clang compilers like clang16 and clang18 and they do not emit
such warnings with -Wparentheses.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307281133.wi0c4SqG-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728055740.2284534-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7e6bd33d1
commit
09fedc7318
|
|
@ -1877,7 +1877,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
|
|||
case 1:
|
||||
AX = abs((s32)DST);
|
||||
do_div(AX, abs((s32)SRC));
|
||||
if ((s32)DST < 0 == (s32)SRC < 0)
|
||||
if (((s32)DST < 0) == ((s32)SRC < 0))
|
||||
DST = (u32)AX;
|
||||
else
|
||||
DST = (u32)-AX;
|
||||
|
|
@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
|
|||
case 1:
|
||||
AX = abs((s32)DST);
|
||||
do_div(AX, abs((s32)IMM));
|
||||
if ((s32)DST < 0 == (s32)IMM < 0)
|
||||
if (((s32)DST < 0) == ((s32)IMM < 0))
|
||||
DST = (u32)AX;
|
||||
else
|
||||
DST = (u32)-AX;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5898,7 +5898,7 @@ static void coerce_reg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
|
|||
s64_min = min(init_s64_max, init_s64_min);
|
||||
|
||||
/* both of s64_max/s64_min positive or negative */
|
||||
if (s64_max >= 0 == s64_min >= 0) {
|
||||
if ((s64_max >= 0) == (s64_min >= 0)) {
|
||||
reg->smin_value = reg->s32_min_value = s64_min;
|
||||
reg->smax_value = reg->s32_max_value = s64_max;
|
||||
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min;
|
||||
|
|
@ -5962,7 +5962,7 @@ static void coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
|
|||
s32_max = max(init_s32_max, init_s32_min);
|
||||
s32_min = min(init_s32_max, init_s32_min);
|
||||
|
||||
if (s32_min >= 0 == s32_max >= 0) {
|
||||
if ((s32_min >= 0) == (s32_max >= 0)) {
|
||||
reg->s32_min_value = s32_min;
|
||||
reg->s32_max_value = s32_max;
|
||||
reg->u32_min_value = (u32)s32_min;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user