mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-11-07 06:17:02 +01:00
ipmr: drop packets with unknown ingress VIF
A packet can race with VIF publication and make ipmr_find_vif() return -1 even though the VIF device pointer is already visible. The parent VIF device check can then pass with an invalid ingress VIF. For (*,G) entries, this can also let the packet be forwarded back out its ingress VIF. Drop packets whose ingress VIF lookup fails in both IPv4 and IPv6 forwarding, before checking the MFC parent device. This prevents forwarding with an unknown ingress VIF and avoids the (*,G) hairpin. Without the early check, the negative index can reach the IPv4 offload lookup only for an skb marked for L3 forwarding offload, currently done by mlxsw. The race is rare; the supplied PoC reports only the UBSAN negative-index diagnostic. Fixes:4eadb88244("ipmr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip_mr_forward()") Fixes:9b1c21d898("ip6mr: do not acquire mrt_lock while calling ip6_mr_forward()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/b966eb102e98f299e45be59ada033a8766e4c6df.1791899747.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai/ Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Suggested-by: Naman Gulati <namangulati@google.com> Signed-off-by: Zhiling Zou <zhilinz@nebusec.ai> Reviewed-by: Naman Gulati <namangulati@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5271fcb94a4d9e697ed64a348e92ea9e74faab1c.1792608753.git.zhilinz@nebusec.ai Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a894b4077d
commit
09280680f2
|
|
@ -2089,7 +2089,8 @@ static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wrong interface: drop packet and (maybe) send PIM assert. */
|
||||
if (rcu_access_pointer(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev) != dev) {
|
||||
if (true_vifi < 0 ||
|
||||
rcu_access_pointer(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev) != dev) {
|
||||
if (rt_is_output_route(skb_rtable(skb))) {
|
||||
/* It is our own packet, looped back.
|
||||
* Very complicated situation...
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2225,7 +2225,8 @@ static void ip6_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Wrong interface: drop packet and (maybe) send PIM assert.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rcu_access_pointer(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev) != dev) {
|
||||
if (true_vifi < 0 ||
|
||||
rcu_access_pointer(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev) != dev) {
|
||||
atomic_long_inc(&c->_c.mfc_un.res.wrong_if);
|
||||
|
||||
if (true_vifi >= 0 && READ_ONCE(mrt->mroute_do_assert) &&
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user