mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-31 02:24:24 +02:00
cxl: Route eeh events to all slices for pci_channel_io_perm_failure state
Fix a boundary condition where in some cases an eeh event with state ==
pci_channel_io_perm_failure wont be passed on to a driver attached to
the virtual PCI device associated with a slice. This will happen in case
the slice just before (n-1) doesn't have any vPHB bus associated with
it, that results in an early return from cxl_pci_error_detected()
callback.
With state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure, the adapter will be removed
irrespective of the return value of cxl_vphb_error_detected(). So we now
always return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECTED for this case i.e even if
the AFU isn't using a vPHB (currently returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE).
Fixes: e4f5fc001a6("cxl: Do not create vPHB if there are no AFU configuration records")
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
97da3854c5
commit
07f5ab6002
|
|
@ -1792,15 +1792,14 @@ static pci_ers_result_t cxl_pci_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
|||
|
||||
/* If we're permanently dead, give up. */
|
||||
if (state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure) {
|
||||
/* Tell the AFU drivers; but we don't care what they
|
||||
* say, we're going away.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < adapter->slices; i++) {
|
||||
afu = adapter->afu[i];
|
||||
/* Only participate in EEH if we are on a virtual PHB */
|
||||
if (afu->phb == NULL)
|
||||
return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NONE;
|
||||
cxl_vphb_error_detected(afu, state);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Tell the AFU drivers; but we don't care what they
|
||||
* say, we're going away.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (afu->phb != NULL)
|
||||
cxl_vphb_error_detected(afu, state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user