btrfs: make sure report_eb_range() is not inlined

If report_rb_range() is inlined into its single caller (check_eb_range()),
we end up with a larger module size, which is undesirable and does not
provide any advantage since this code is for a cold path which we don't
expect to ever hit.

Add the noinline attribute to report_rb_range() and while at it also make
it return void as it always returns true.

Before this change (with gcc 14.2.0-19 from Debian):

  $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  2018267	 176232	  15592	2210091	 21b92b	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

After this change:

  $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  2017835	 176048	  15592	2209475	 21b6c3	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Also, replacing the noinline with __cold, yields slighty worse results:

  $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  2017889	 176048	  15592	2209529	 21b6f9	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana 2026-04-24 16:08:57 +01:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 0938971abc
commit 0278d21807

View File

@ -3986,15 +3986,14 @@ int read_extent_buffer_pages(struct extent_buffer *eb, int mirror_num,
return 0;
}
static bool report_eb_range(const struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
unsigned long len)
/* Never inlined to decrease code size, as this is called in a cold path. */
static noinline void report_eb_range(const struct extent_buffer *eb,
unsigned long start, unsigned long len)
{
btrfs_warn(eb->fs_info,
"access to eb bytenr %llu len %u out of range start %lu len %lu",
eb->start, eb->len, start, len);
DEBUG_WARN();
return true;
}
/*
@ -4010,8 +4009,10 @@ static inline bool check_eb_range(const struct extent_buffer *eb,
unsigned long offset;
/* start, start + len should not go beyond eb->len nor overflow */
if (unlikely(check_add_overflow(start, len, &offset) || offset > eb->len))
return report_eb_range(eb, start, len);
if (unlikely(check_add_overflow(start, len, &offset) || offset > eb->len)) {
report_eb_range(eb, start, len);
return true;
}
return false;
}